javanna commented on code in PR #13747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13747#discussion_r1756577220


##########
lucene/join/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/join/MergeableCollector.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.lucene.search.join;
+
+import java.io.IOException;
+import org.apache.lucene.search.Collector;
+
+interface MergeableCollector<C extends MergeableCollector<C>> extends 
Collector {
+
+  /** Folds the results from another collector of the same type into this 
collector. */
+  void merge(C collector) throws IOException;
+}

Review Comment:
   > This would mean that every collector needs a corresponding 
CollectorManager, or at least a CollectorManager for every output type, right?
   
   I guess it depends, you could also reuse the same collector manager across 
collectors if they share a sub-type perhaps. But as a general guideline, yes. 
After all, search goes through collector managers and collector managers are 
responsible to create collectors and reduce multiple collectors into a single 
result, whether that be a collector or some more meaningful result class.
   
   I don't have a strong opinion, but I thought that moving your merge method 
to the collector manager should not be a big change, I may be missing some 
details perhaps.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to