jpountz commented on PR #13585:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13585#issuecomment-2258120692

   Thanks @mikemccand for taking a look at this large PR! I think I applied all 
your suggestions. The format docs should be up-to-date wrt how skip data is 
stored, and I did the codec dance (moving Lucene99PostingsFormat and 
Lucene99Codec to lucene/backward-codecs, making Lucene99PostingsFormat 
read-only, adding a test-only Lucene99RWPostingsFormat for testing, moving all 
our special terms dictionary formats to Lucene912PostingsFormat, moving the 
completion postings format to Lucene912PostingsFormat).
   
   Note that I removed `TestLazyProxSkipping`, which assumed separate skip data 
and postings.
   
   I plan on merging soon, as this PR is now in a state where conflicts easily 
arise and are hard to address. One cannot run luceneutil anymore as luceneutil 
complains that `Lucene99Codec` is missing, but my last run before doing the 
codec dance was very similar to the last one shared above.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to