mikemccand commented on PR #12857: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12857#issuecomment-2104850564
I don't fully understand this change, but it looks like it is stalled on proving it shows lower CPU and/or heap/GC load? Could we benchmark this change using luceneutil? It's able to create vector indices that have X% deletions and then run `KNNByte/FloatVectorQuery`... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
