mikemccand commented on PR #12517:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12517#issuecomment-2025238979

   > The built kuromoji jar with unidic-cwj-3.1.1-full eventually becomes 442M. 
Besides the size, I think we should consider performance. I'm worried that 
there can be a significant impact on analysis/indexing speed. Do you have any 
benchmark result on that?
   
   luceneutil has a `runAnalyzerPerf.py` benchmark, and the nightly script runs 
it and [posts the results 
here](https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/analyzers.html), 
including Kuromoji.  We could maybe test tokens/sec throughput using that 
benchy for this PR running on UniDic?  I'm not sure how we would conclude 
whether it's fast enough since current Kuromoji (`main`) can't build UniDic.  
Maybe we could defer performance testing / optimizing on UniDic to a later 
issue...


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to