jpountz commented on code in PR #13124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13124#discussion_r1525270702


##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SegmentMerger.java:
##########
@@ -130,19 +135,31 @@ MergeState merge() throws IOException {
             IOContext.READ,
             segmentWriteState.segmentSuffix);
 
+    TaskExecutor taskExecutor = new 
TaskExecutor(mergeState.intraMergeTaskExecutor);
+    List<Callable<Void>> mergingTasks = new ArrayList<>();
+
     if (mergeState.mergeFieldInfos.hasNorms()) {
       mergeWithLogging(this::mergeNorms, segmentWriteState, segmentReadState, 
"norms", numMerged);
     }
 
     mergeWithLogging(this::mergeTerms, segmentWriteState, segmentReadState, 
"postings", numMerged);

Review Comment:
   Presumably, the worst-case scenario is not much worse than if you have many 
concurrent merges, so I think it's fine.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to