zhaih commented on code in PR #13124:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13124#discussion_r1498656246
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat.java:
##########
@@ -152,7 +153,25 @@ public Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat() {
* @param beamWidth the size of the queue maintained during graph
construction.
*/
public Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat(int maxConn, int beamWidth) {
- this(maxConn, beamWidth, DEFAULT_NUM_MERGE_WORKER, null);
Review Comment:
If there will be more future inner segment concurrent merge, I think it
might still be better to leave the `numMergeWorkers` here rather than put it in
IWC? Otherwise we'll either have too many similar configures in IWC or hard to
allocate weight on different types of merges?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
