jpountz commented on issue #12916:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12916#issuecomment-1864843912

   Does someone understand if adding synchronization is fixing a real bug of it 
it just helps hide a J9 bug? This method is subject to contention and #12199 
was about avoiding locking on this method, which proved to help significantly 
when indexing cheap documents on several threads. I'm looking at the test and 
the code and can't see what sort of race condition may cause this test to fail.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to