javanna commented on code in PR #12799:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12799#discussion_r1400536223
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene99/Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat.java:
##########
@@ -160,12 +160,12 @@ public Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat(int maxConn, int
beamWidth) {
* @param maxConn the maximum number of connections to a node in the HNSW
graph
* @param beamWidth the size of the queue maintained during graph
construction.
* @param numMergeWorkers number of workers (threads) that will be used when
doing merge. If
- * larger than 1, a non-null {@link ExecutorService} must be passed as
mergeExec
- * @param mergeExec the {@link ExecutorService} that will be used by ALL
vector writers that are
+ * larger than 1, a non-null {@link TaskExecutor} must be passed as
mergeExec
+ * @param mergeExec the {@link TaskExecutor} that will be used by ALL vector
writers that are
* generated by this format to do the merge
*/
public Lucene99HnswVectorsFormat(
- int maxConn, int beamWidth, int numMergeWorkers, ExecutorService
mergeExec) {
+ int maxConn, int beamWidth, int numMergeWorkers, TaskExecutor mergeExec)
{
Review Comment:
Thanks for voicing your opinion. My main goal was to create one instance of
TaskExecutor per Executor, hence create it as soon as possible. I also believe
that we will want to extend TaskExecutor's capabilities instead of relying on
executor service capabilities in specific places.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
