uschindler commented on PR #12737:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12737#issuecomment-1787795291

   To prevent any surprises, I backported the branch and also the benchmark 
module to 9.x and ran everything with Java 11.0.13 (on my Intel Laptop):
   
   ```
   branch_9x (Java 11.0.13), Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz, 1992 MHz
   Benchmark                                  (size)   Mode  Cnt  Score   Error 
  Units
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatCosineScalar        1024  thrpt    5  0,827 ± 0,021 
 ops/us
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatDotProductScalar    1024  thrpt    5  2,293 ± 0,070 
 ops/us
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatSquareScalar        1024  thrpt    5  1,443 ± 0,057 
 ops/us
   
   Robert backported Java 11, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz, 1992 MHz
   Benchmark                                  (size)   Mode  Cnt  Score   Error 
  Units
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatCosineScalar        1024  thrpt    5  1,646 ± 0,216 
 ops/us
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatDotProductScalar    1024  thrpt    5  3,189 ± 0,221 
 ops/us
   VectorUtilBenchmark.floatSquareScalar        1024  thrpt    5  2,716 ± 0,098 
 ops/us
   ```
   
   In conclusion, no surprises with Hotspot of Java 11, so it is safe to 
backport this branch and have scalar mode also improved between 1 and 2 times.
   
   The direction if we enable FMA on AMD or not is still to be discussed.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to