mikemccand commented on issue #12696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12696#issuecomment-1775638986

   > Are there any additional corpora that we should also test this with?
   
   Maybe the NYC taxis?  This is a more sparse, and tiny docs (vs dense and 
medium/large docs in `enwiki`).  The tooling for indexing the NYC taxis corpus 
is already in `luceneutil` (it runs nightly: 
https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/sparseResults.html).  This is a 
nice counter-point to `enwiki`.
   
   > Would this be a potential change for Lucene 9.9 or perhaps 10.0?
   
   That's a good question.  It is a very low level index format change, and no 
API change.  It would be fully back-compat whether we release in 9.9 vs 10.0.  
I don't see why we should withhold the change until 10.0, so maybe 9.9?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to