gsmiller commented on issue #12696: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12696#issuecomment-1769095158
These results are really interesting! As another option, I wonder if it's worth thinking about this problem as a new codec (sandbox module to start?) that biases towards query speed instead of index size? There may be other decisions we would make differently in a codec biasing in that direction beyond FOR patching. I dunno... maybe that's a terrible idea with a "slippery slope" problem. But I also worry a bit about adding configuration switches to a default codec that need to be maintained. One-size-fits-all solutions are indeed challenging... -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
