jpountz commented on PR #12661: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12661#issuecomment-1765890646
Ohhhhh your explanation makes sense, and I agree with you that a more efficient encoding would unlikely help conterbalance the fact that more arcs need to be read per output. So this looks like a hard search/space trade-off: we either get fast reads or good compression but we can't get both? I wonder if extending the `Outputs` class directly would help, instead of storing data in an opaque `byte[]`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
