gf2121 commented on code in PR #12324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12324#discussion_r1212899948
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/IndexedDISI.java:
##########
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ public static RandomAccessInput createJumpTable(
// SPARSE variables
boolean exists;
+ int nextExistDocInBlock = -1;
Review Comment:
```
int block = -1;
long blockEnd;
long denseBitmapOffset = -1; // Only used for DENSE blocks
int nextBlockIndex = -1;
Method method;
int doc = -1;
int index = -1;
// SPARSE variables
boolean exists;
int nextExistDocInBlock = -1;
// DENSE variables
long word;
int wordIndex = -1;
```
There has already been several -1 defined here to mean the uninitialized
status. And as talked below Integer.MAX_VALUE should be removed. So I prefer to
keep what it is. What do you think?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
