rmuir commented on PR #12064: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12064#issuecomment-1377152361
> I agree. We need to address this. Makes me wonder about the work done here: #10177. Seems promising, though the cost of flush increases (because of clustering), but the data structure seems to fit WAY better inside of Lucene. another pathetic, unscalable in-memory toy. i'll reject it as we don't need yet another HNSW, it is the last thing we need. please, ignore such garbage, ppl can do that in-memory stuff with a jazillion python libraries. this is a search engine. look at scalable algorithms *ONLY*, e.g. DiskANN is the baseline for https://big-ann-benchmarks.com/, so that seems like a reasonable start. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
