luyuncheng commented on PR #11987: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11987#issuecomment-1333932432
> thanks for running. somehow i think bulk merge didnt get disabled. without bulk merge optimization, indexing time should be significantly higher, the benchmark should be very very slow. @rmuir I am also curious about it. BUT i use __arthas__ vmtools to see BULK_MERGE_ENABLED is __false__  and i manually modified lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/compressing/Lucene90CompressingStoredFieldsWriter.java#BULK_MERGE_ENABLED as __false__ when enableBulkMerge=false -Xmx256m it shows almost the same: | | Baseline | Candidate | | :--- | :----: | ---: | | indexing_time_msec | | | | BEST_SPEED | 366735.00 | 368407.00 | | BEST_COMPRESSION | 849980.00 | 852214.00 | | retrieved_time_msec | | | | BEST_SPEED | 256.10 | 278.06 | | BEST_COMPRESSION | 2584.96 | 2632.69 | AND my runStoredFieldsBenchmark `geonames.txt` dataset is about 1.5GB with 12489745 lines allCountries data. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
