msokolov commented on PR #947: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/947#issuecomment-1185649145
I pushed an updated luceneutil PR adapting to these changes https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/pull/181. Running that perf test I saw consistent gains (20-55% depending on the test case) as compared to the earlier test runs. I also noticed that the profiler shows the most expensive function during indexing is FixedBitSet.clear(), which makes me think we mioght want to use sparse bitsets for the "upper" layers of the graph which have many fewer nodes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
