zacharymorn commented on PR #833: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/833#issuecomment-1117003662
> > the baseline could run on the raw reader and the contender would wrap the reader with ExitableDirectoryReader and a very large timeout that's almost certainly not going to be hit, so that we could measure how much search performance we're trading by introducing these wrappers and timeout checks > > This sounds good to me (with a benchmark, we could tune `DOCS_BETWEEN_TIMEOUT_CHECK`?). I'll take a look - I think it's feasible but could take some time for me :) [mikemccand/luceneutil#168](https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/issues/168) Thanks for the suggestions and @mocobeta for opening the luceneutil issue! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
