vigyasharma commented on a change in pull request #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/633#discussion_r822174425
##########
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInfos.java
##########
@@ -352,6 +352,14 @@ public FieldDimensions(int dimensionCount, int
indexDimensionCount, int dimensio
this.softDeletesFieldName = softDeletesFieldName;
}
+ public void verifyFieldInfo(FieldInfo fi) {
Review comment:
This method makes sure that incoming index fields are compatible with
the destination index, e.g. vectors have the same dimensions and use the same
similarity function.
Changed access to package private. I retained method name -
`verifyFieldInfo()`, as it internally calls `verifySoftDeletedFieldName` and
`verifySameSchema`, which have a similar naming style.
I can change it if `assert*()` is more in line with the Lucene convention.
In which case, I also think that it should only return a condition and the
asserts should be done by the caller.. Let me know..
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
