gautamworah96 commented on a change in pull request #658:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/658#discussion_r802141959
##########
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/PointRangeQuery.java
##########
@@ -369,6 +369,54 @@ public Scorer scorer(LeafReaderContext context) throws
IOException {
return scorerSupplier.get(Long.MAX_VALUE);
}
+ @Override
+ public int count(LeafReaderContext context) throws IOException {
+ LeafReader reader = context.reader();
+
+ PointValues values = reader.getPointValues(field);
+ if (values == null) {
+ // No docs in this segment indexed any points or this field did not
contain any points
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (values.getNumIndexDimensions() != numDims) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException(
+ "field=\""
+ + field
+ + "\" was indexed with numIndexDimensions="
+ + values.getNumIndexDimensions()
+ + " but this query has numDims="
+ + numDims);
+ }
+ if (bytesPerDim != values.getBytesPerDimension()) {
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException(
+ "field=\""
+ + field
+ + "\" was indexed with bytesPerDim="
+ + values.getBytesPerDimension()
+ + " but this query has bytesPerDim="
+ + bytesPerDim);
+ }
+
+ if (reader.hasDeletions() == false
+ && numDims == 1
+ && values.getDocCount() == reader.maxDoc()
Review comment:
It may be possible that some docs don't have point indexed at all and
some have more than one. This will still satisfy the numDocs=numPoints check
but will not be good for our use case
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
