[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17428943#comment-17428943
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10173:
----------------------------------------------------------

Commit f64c81c3f83ee00885a127fa4adc00c34583cc2c in lucene's branch 
refs/heads/main from Chris M. Hostetter
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=f64c81c ]

LUCENE-10173: remove max-worker restriction added by LUCENE-9488 when 'useGpg' 
in effect

Also update docs to remove the point of confusion that lead to thinking that 
restriction was useful


> remove "--max-workers 1" restriction when using external GPG w/gradle build
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10173
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
>            Assignee: Chris M. Hostetter
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: LUCENE-10173.patch
>
>
> LUCENE-9488 amended the existing support for using gradle's signing plugin 
> with external GPG process to sign files, by adding support for the signing 
> plugin's java-implementation, and switching to the pure-java implementation 
> by default.
> In the process dawid missunderstood some of documented issues that can pop up 
> when using an external GPG process, and thought that using an external GPG 
> process could _only_ work when using {{--max-workers 1}}.
> As a result, when changing the build so that using an external GPG process 
> was _optional_ via 'useGpg' he added an explicit check to fail the build if 
> this option is used w/o {{--max-workers 1}}.
> This issue is to:
>  * revert that restriction when 'useGpg' is specified since it isn't 
> necessary (nor as it turns out, does it actually help)
>  * add a new restriction when 'useGpg' is specified to fail fast if the 
> required keyName isn't provided (this was handled in a differnet way prior to 
> LUCENE-9488, but that logic was removed when 'useGpg' became optional – we 
> should add it back if and only if 'useGpg' is specified to prevent a very 
> confusing and missleading error message that can occur otherwise)
>  * improve the associated docs



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to