[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17382366#comment-17382366
 ] 

Gautam Worah commented on LUCENE-9450:
--------------------------------------

Hi [~mayya] , I had looked at that test briefly when it was disabled.

So, for now, I could modify the test so that it checks that the previously 
indexed StoredFields based field, can be read (and not modified).

But the larger concern, is that with this [LUCENE-9334] change, a user won't be 
able to add docs with the new Lucene 9.0 version without reindexing (if they 
have fields that were previously indexed with an older Lucene version).

 

 

> Taxonomy index should use DocValues not StoredFields
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9450
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9450
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/facet
>    Affects Versions: 8.5.2
>            Reporter: Gautam Worah
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-9450-localrun.py-v1, wip_taxonomy_patch
>
>          Time Spent: 3h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The taxonomy index that maps binning labels to ordinals was created before 
> Lucene added BinaryDocValues.
> I've attached a WIP patch (does not pass tests currently)
> Issue suggested by [~mikemccand]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to