glawson0 commented on pull request #157: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/157#issuecomment-872219546
Failure is from random testing. It looks like I'm overthinking how to handle calculating the new output node in `recoverHole`. Since multiple graphs could look the same after deletions, but would have flattened differently without the deletes, calculating future nodes in the middle of flattening isn't going to work. Instead the code will have to place at the end of the output graph adjusting for known holes. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
