[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-9960.
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: main (9.0)
       Resolution: Fixed

> Avoid unnecessary top element replacement for equal elements in PriorityQueue
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9960
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Dawid Weiss
>            Assignee: Dawid Weiss
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>          Time Spent: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently the priority queue implementation always replaces the top (minimum) 
> element, even if it is equal to the provided argument. This seems a 
> redundant. I've modified the condition and polished a few other minor things 
> (unnecessary cast, size modification even if add throws AIOOB).
> Separately from the above, it is quite weird that a pq of size zero is 
> allowed (and actually used!). The code is incorrect in this case, allowing 
> add() to proceed and top() to return the added value. I understand it's a 
> heavily used data structure but perhaps we should at least add an assertion 
> to add() checking for zero-size?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to