jpountz commented on pull request #81: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/81#issuecomment-820199532
> I guess the next step for me would be to try to implement a new Scorer (instead of BulkScorer) using BMM, or update the existing DisjunctionSumScorer to incorporate BMM, and see if it performs better than WANDScorer for pure disjunction term query? I think the BulkScorer might be interesting to look into as well given how its API makes it easier to score entire ranges of doc IDs at once (see e.g. how `BooleanScorer` works) but +1 to start with a `Scorer`. IMO it'd be easier to start a new `Scorer` rather than trying to update `DisjunctionSumScorer`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
