[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17319093#comment-17319093
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-9335:
--------------------------------------
bq. DisjunctionMaxScorer
It should be DisjunctionSumScorer if we want to get the same scoring
(DisjunctionSumScorer sums up scores of the clauses while DisjunctionMaxScorer
takes the max).
Can you run the benchmark with verifyCounts=False like we do for nightlies so
that it would only check top hits?
https://github.com/mikemccand/luceneutil/blob/fbc9ae15a1bb47f7e15c95fb70f1bda57faccfc1/src/python/nightlyBench.py#L822
> Add a bulk scorer for disjunctions that does dynamic pruning
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-9335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9335
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
>
> Lucene often gets benchmarked against other engines, e.g. against Tantivy and
> PISA at [https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/] or against research
> prototypes in Table 1 of
> [https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~jimmylin/publications/Grand_etal_ECIR2020_preprint.pdf].
> Given that top-level disjunctions of term queries are commonly used for
> benchmarking, it would be nice to optimize this case a bit more, I suspect
> that we could make fewer per-document decisions by implementing a BulkScorer
> instead of a Scorer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
