[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17318413#comment-17318413
 ] 

Zach Chen commented on LUCENE-9335:
-----------------------------------

[~atris], not sure if you are working on this currently? Right now I'm just 
exploring this issue out of curiosity, and hopefully my probe doesn't impact 
your ongoing work.

> Add a bulk scorer for disjunctions that does dynamic pruning
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9335
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9335
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Lucene often gets benchmarked against other engines, e.g. against Tantivy and 
> PISA at [https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/] or against research 
> prototypes in Table 1 of 
> [https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~jimmylin/publications/Grand_etal_ECIR2020_preprint.pdf].
>  Given that top-level disjunctions of term queries are commonly used for 
> benchmarking, it would be nice to optimize this case a bit more, I suspect 
> that we could make fewer per-document decisions by implementing a BulkScorer 
> instead of a Scorer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to