[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17277864#comment-17277864
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-15127:
------------------------------------

I'm glad to see progress on this. Looks like we'll be getting a sleek, 
reproducible unified Dockerfile which hopefully is acceptable as an official 
_/solr image as well. I don't have the energy to dive deeper now, but I'm glad 
Chris and Houston seem to collaborate well on this!

> All-In-One Dockerfile for building local images as well as reproducible 
> release builds directly from (remote) git tags
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15127
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15127
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-15127.patch
>
>
> There was a recent dev@lucene discussion about the future of the 
> github/docker-solr repo and (Apache) "official" solr docker images and using 
> the "apache/solr" nameing vs (docker-library official) "_/solr" names...
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202101.mbox/%3CCAD4GwrNCPEnAJAjy4tY%3DpMeX5vWvnFyLe9ZDaXmF4J8XchA98Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> In that disussion, mak pointed out that docker-library evidently allows for 
> some more flexibility in the way "official" docker-library packages can be 
> built (compared to the rules that were evidnlty in place when the mak setup 
> the current docker-solr image building process/tooling), pointing out how the 
> "docker official" elasticsearch images are current built from the "elastic 
> official" elasticsearch images...
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202101.mbox/%3C3CED9683-1DD2-4F08-97F9-4FC549EDE47D%40greenhills.co.uk%3E
> Based on this, I proposed that we could probably restructure the Solr 
> Dockerfile so that it could be useful for both "local development" -- using 
> the current repo checkout -- as well as for "apache official" apache/solr 
> images that could be reproducibly built directly from pristine git tags using 
> the remote git URL syntax supported by "docker build" (and then -- evidently 
> -- extended by trivial one line Dockerfiles for the "docker-library official" 
> _/solr images)...
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/202101.mbox/%3Calpine.DEB.2.21.2101221423340.16298%40slate%3E
> This jira tracks this idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to