[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17277119#comment-17277119
 ] 

Markus Jelsma commented on LUCENE-9636:
---------------------------------------

* [LUCENE-9636|http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9636]: Faster 
decoding of postings for some numbers of bits per value. 
(Guo Feng via Adrien Grand)

According to the CHANGES, this ticket should be marked as resolved is it not?

> Exact and operation to get a SIMD optimize
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9636
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9636
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/codecs
>            Reporter: Feng Guo
>            Priority: Trivial
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In decode6(), decode7(), decode14(), decode15(), decode24() longs always `&` 
> a same mask and do some shift. By printing assemble language, i find that JIT 
> did not optimize them with SIMD instructions. But when we extract all `&` 
> operations and do them first, JIT will use SIMD optimize on them.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to