[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17176922#comment-17176922 ]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-14687: ------------------------------------ Agree, this is super complex and trappy and this will be a great usability improvement! Thanks, Hoss! > Make child/parent query parsers natively aware of _nest_path_ > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-14687 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14687 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter > Priority: Major > > A long standing pain point of the parent/child QParsers is the "all parents" > bitmask/filter specified via the "which" and "of" params (respectively). > This is particularly tricky/painful to "get right" when dealing with > multi-level nested documents... > * > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14383?focusedCommentId=17166339&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17166339 > * > [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7633a366dd76e7ce9d98e6b9f2a65da8af8240e846f789d938c8113f%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E] > ...and it's *really* hard to get right when the nested structure isn't 100% > consistent among all docs: > * collections that mix docs w/o children and docs that have children. > ** Ex: blog posts, some of which have child docs that are "comments", but > some don't > * when some "types" of documents can exist at multiple levels: > ** Ex: top level "product" documents, which may have 2 types of children: > "skus" and "manuals", but "skus" may also have their own wku-specific child > "manuals" > BUT! ... now that we have some semi-native support for the {{_nest_path_}} > field, i think it may be possible to offer an "easier to use" variant syntax > of the parent/child QParsers that directly depends on these fields. This new > syntax should be optional – and purely syntactic sugar. "expert" users should > be able to do all the same things using the existing syntax (possibly more > efficiently depending on what invarients exist in their data model) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org