[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17176681#comment-17176681
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-14687:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 3095dd23958aa3dd9190ca698e1258f994ad374c in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/jira/SOLR-14383 from Chris M. Hostetter
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=3095dd2 ]

SOLR-14383: minor typo/inconsistency fix in sample doc ids

Also add a unit test of hueristic for 'safe' of/which params based on 
_nest_path_ before trying to figure out how to document it clearly

(This is basically the manual 'long form' way of writing child/parent queries 
using the (hypothetical) syntactic sugar described in SOLR-14687)


> Make child/parent query parsers natively aware of _nest_path_
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14687
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14687
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
>            Priority: Major
>
> A long standing pain point of the parent/child QParsers is the "all parents" 
> bitmask/filter specified via the "which" and "of" params (respectively).
> This is particularly tricky/painful to "get right" when dealing with 
> multi-level nested documents...
>  * 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14383?focusedCommentId=17166339&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17166339
>  * 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7633a366dd76e7ce9d98e6b9f2a65da8af8240e846f789d938c8113f%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E]
> ...and it's *really* hard to get right when the nested structure isn't 100% 
> consistent among all docs:
>  * collections that mix docs w/o children and docs that have children.
>  ** Ex: blog posts, some of which have child docs that are "comments", but 
> some don't
>  * when some "types" of documents can exist at multiple levels:
>  ** Ex: top level "product" documents, which may have 2 types of children: 
> "skus" and "manuals", but "skus" may also have their own wku-specific child 
> "manuals"
> BUT! ... now that we have some semi-native support for the {{_nest_path_}} 
> field, i think it may be possible to offer an "easier to use" variant syntax 
> of the parent/child QParsers that directly depends on these fields. This new 
> syntax should be optional – and purely syntactic sugar. "expert" users should 
> be able to do all the same things using the existing syntax (possibly more 
> efficiently depending on what invarients exist in their data model)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to