[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17174251#comment-17174251
 ] 

Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-14641:
-------------------------------------

bq. I disagree. In general, whoever wishes to introduce a change should own the 
performance testing, no matter who actually does it. Others can volunteer, but 
ultimate obligation should remain with the committer introducing the change.

I said that because I feel that you did not even take a look at the commit, if 
you do you will see that the needs for a perf run here is not neccessary. 

> PeerSync, remove canHandleVersionRanges check
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14641
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14641
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Cao Manh Dat
>            Assignee: Cao Manh Dat
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.7
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SOLR-9207 introduces PeerSync with updates range which committed in 6.2 and 
> 7.0. To maintain backward compatibility at the time we introduce an endpoint 
> in RealTimeGetComponent to check whether a node support that feature or not. 
> It served well its purpose and it should be removed to reduce complexity and 
> a request-response trip for asking that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to