murblanc commented on a change in pull request #1684:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1684#discussion_r467453245



##########
File path: 
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/cluster/placement/ReplicaPlacement.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.solr.cluster.placement;
+
+/**
+ * <p>Placement decision for a single {@link Replica}. Note this placement 
decision is used as part of a {@link WorkOrder},
+ * it does not directly lead to the plugin code getting a corresponding {@link 
Replica} instance, nor does it require the
+ * plugin to provide a {@link Shard} instance (the plugin code gets such 
instances for existing replicas and shards in the
+ * cluster but does not create them directly for adding new replicas for new 
or existing shards).
+ *
+ * <p>Captures the {@link Shard} (via the shard name), {@link Node} and {@link 
Replica.ReplicaType} of a Replica to be created.
+ */
+public interface ReplicaPlacement {

Review comment:
       Ok, added. Note that the interfaces in 
`org.apache.solr.cluster.placement` only condition what the plugin code is 
seeing, not what's present in the objects. The `Request` is present in the 
`WorkOrder` instances and I added it to the interface, but even if it's not in 
the interface, Solr side code would have it.
   My thinking (by not putting it in the interface) is that plugin code is 
creating these instances so it should know which instance is which and doesn't 
need a method on that instance to find out.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to