[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17095757#comment-17095757
]
Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe commented on SOLR-13289:
------------------------------------------------------
bq. IMHO the hitCountRelation vs numFound
Yeah, I'm not sure about this either. I was thinking in "numFoundRelation", but
then I thought "maybe it's clear that this is the relation between "numFound"
and the actual number of hits". I don't know, me not being a native English
speaker certainly may be obscuring things for me. I think {{precision}} may be
a confusing in the context of IR.
bq. perhaps use GT_EQ or EQ, short and not too cryptic?
+1. We don't need to be so verbose for every request.
> Support for BlockMax WAND
> -------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13289
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-13289.patch, SOLR-13289.patch
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-8135 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed improvement. Need to
> expose this via Solr. When enabled, the numFound returned will not be exact.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
