[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17095150#comment-17095150
 ] 

Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-13289:
-----------------------------------------

IMHO the {{hitCountRelation}} vs {{numFound}} is jarring and at the first 
glance looks cryptic and unrelated to each other. I understand that this 
reflects the API naming in Lucene, but I think Solr could be much more 
user-friendly here and use a name that is both related to {{numFound}} and 
self-explanatory - perhaps {{numFoundPrecision}} or simply {{precision}}?

After all, Solr doesn't use Lucene's {{totalHits}} name either, right?

The enum name is also very long - in total this element adds 40 characters to 
the response for something that is a simple flag ...

> Support for BlockMax WAND
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-13289
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13289
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Assignee: Tomas Eduardo Fernandez Lobbe
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-13289.patch, SOLR-13289.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-8135 introduced BlockMax WAND as a major speed improvement. Need to 
> expose this via Solr. When enabled, the numFound returned will not be exact.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to