[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17070809#comment-17070809
 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-14170:
---------------------------------------------

[~janhoy], take a prior deep breath the next time you're dealing with me.


{quote}So why did you assign yourself to this JIRA January 6th if you disagree 
it should be done?
{quote}
Where do you see the disagreement? I just don't see any reason to use the 
wording I quoted. As for the crux of this issue, i.e. tagging it as 
experimental (or APIs likely to change), I agree with that and I assigned this 
issue to myself in order to do so.

 
{quote}We agreed on this very clearly in Slack and I am disappointed you resist.
{quote}
Save your disappointments for later. I'm not "resisting" anything, I just 
mentioned that I don't see a reason why such wording should be used. Keep in 
mind that Slack is not an official medium of communication for our project; 
JIRA is. And, I don't remember agreeing to disrecommend people from using it in 
production. If I did, I was wrong.

 
{quote}until we stamp it as GA.
{quote}
There is no concept of GA for any feature/component of Solr. And, packages 
support versioning (and Solr version constraints). So, as long as a package 
maintainer deals with API changes and tags his packages for the right Solr 
version, the end user shouldn't need to bother about API changes.

> Tag package feature as experimental
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14170
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>            Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 8.6
>
>
> The new package store and package installation feature introduced in 8.4 was 
> supposed to be tagged as lucene.experimental with a clear warning in 
> ref-guide "Not yet recommended for production use"
> Let's add that for 8.5 so there is no doubt that if you use the feature you 
> know the risks. Once the APIs have stabilized and there are a number of 
> packages available "in the wild", we can decide to release it as a "GA" 
> feature, but not yet!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to