[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17034466#comment-17034466
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-14247:
---------------------------------------
What I usually do here is set up a mail filter to put any e-mails that mention
this test into a special folder, I'll do that too. There are some false
positives there, but it's manageable.
I ran a beast session with 12 parallel executors to try to simulate putting a
load on the hardware, but that's a shot in the dark compared to having this out
in the real world.
> IndexSizeTriggerMixedBoundsTest does a lot of sleeping
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-14247
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14247
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Tests
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Assignee: Mike Drob
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: master (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When I run tests locally, the slowest reported test is always
> IndexSizeTriggerMixedBoundsTest coming in at around 2 minutes.
> I took a look at the code and discovered that at least 80s of that is all
> sleeps!
> There might need to be more synchronization and ordering added back in, but
> when I removed all of the sleeps the test still passed locally for me, so I'm
> not too sure what the point was or why we were slowing the system down so
> much.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
