[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17028469#comment-17028469
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-12325:
-----------------------------------------
Ok I spotted escaping issue in
[https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/job/Solr-reference-guide-master/javadoc/json-facet-api.html].
I'm looking forward for contributing better wording for this. So, far I put at
least details as possible. Is it worth to make claims about expecting
performance improvement and/or disclosure details of parent bitset handling?
> introduce uniqueBlockQuery(parent:true) aggregation for JSON Facet
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12325
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12325
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Facet Module
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Assignee: Mikhail Khludnev
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 8.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR-12325.patch, SOLR-12325.patch, SOLR-12325.patch,
> SOLR-12325.patch
>
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> It might be faster twin for {{uniqueBlock(\_root_)}}. Please utilise buildin
> query parsing method, don't invent your own.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
