dsmiley commented on a change in pull request #1151: SOLR-13890: Add
"top-level" DVTQ implementation
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1151#discussion_r364302655
##########
File path: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/TermsQParserPlugin.java
##########
@@ -142,4 +158,112 @@ public Query parse() throws SyntaxError {
}
};
}
+
+ private static class TopLevelDocValuesTermsQuery extends DocValuesTermsQuery
implements ExtendedQuery{
+ private final String fieldName;
+ private SortedSetDocValues topLevelDocValues;
+ private LongBitSet topLevelTermOrdinals;
+ private boolean matchesAtLeastOneTerm = false;
+ private boolean cache = true;
+ private boolean cacheSeparately = false;
+ private int cost;
+
+
+ public TopLevelDocValuesTermsQuery(String field, BytesRef... terms) {
+ super(field, terms);
+ this.fieldName = field;
+ }
+
+ public Weight createWeight(IndexSearcher searcher, final ScoreMode
scoreMode, float boost) throws IOException {
+ topLevelDocValues =
DocValues.getSortedSet(((SolrIndexSearcher)searcher).getSlowAtomicReader(),
fieldName);
Review comment:
If not a SolrIndexSearcher than return super.createWeight (your idea
based on Mikhail's comment)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
