[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17009789#comment-17009789
 ] 

Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-13890:
-----------------------------------------

bq. Backwards compatible? Does that apply here
Fair. It's private. Haven't noticed it before.
bq. avoid per-segment iteration for performance reasons. 
Here in _per-segment iteration_ you mean _reading per-segment ordinals_, since 
iteration, scorer, TPI are always per-segment. The patch avoids _reading 
per-segment ordinals_ via top-level wrapper SlowAtomicReader, which is a little 
bit outdated concept. What code can do: obtain per-segment docvalues, get 
segement ordinal per doc, than map it to global ordinal (that's done in 
MultiDocValues), than global ordinal might be checked in bitset (if I remember 
concept right) .

Then, cast occurrence in file doesn't mean a query doesn't have a condition to 
accept Lucene's searcher.  As a test case you can use this query in 
deleteByQuery.  

> Add postfilter support to {!terms} queries
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-13890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13890
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: query parsers
>    Affects Versions: master (9.0)
>            Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
>            Assignee: Jason Gerlowski
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-13890.patch, SOLR-13890.patch, SOLR-13890.patch, 
> SOLR-13890.patch, SOLR-13890.patch, SOLR-13890.patch, Screen Shot 2020-01-02 
> at 2.25.12 PM.png, post_optimize_performance.png, 
> toplevel-tpi-perf-comparison.png
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There are some use-cases where it'd be nice if the "terms" qparser created a 
> query that could be run as a postfilter.  Particularly, when users are 
> checking for hundreds or thousands of terms, a postfilter implementation can 
> be more performant than the standard processing.
> WIth this issue, I'd like to propose a post-filter implementation for the 
> {{docValuesTermsFilter}} "method".  Postfilter creation can use a 
> SortedSetDocValues object to populate a DV bitset with the "terms" being 
> checked for.  Each document run through the post-filter can look at their 
> doc-values for the field in question and check them efficiently against the 
> constructed bitset.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to