amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #6651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/6651#discussion_r1100447577
##########
spark/v3.3/spark/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/SparkTable.java:
##########
@@ -247,9 +247,6 @@ public ScanBuilder newScanBuilder(CaseInsensitiveStringMap
options) {
@Override
public WriteBuilder newWriteBuilder(LogicalWriteInfo info) {
- Preconditions.checkArgument(
- snapshotId == null, "Cannot write to table at a specific snapshot:
%s", snapshotId);
Review Comment:
Good point @namrathamyske , I was a bit short sighted we actually do want to
leverage the statistics for the specific snapshot for writes. These statistics
would be used during the scan itself (for example MERGE INTO branch) . So
either we 1.) seek a good way to differentiate between a time travel query
where the write shouldn't be able to be applied and an intentional write on a
branch or 2.) we just relax the check that a snapshot is set as you did
earlier.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
