Guosmilesmile commented on PR #18303: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18303#issuecomment-6605261700
> Do we want to do the same sinkId approach with the `IcebergSink` as well? @pvary Yes, if this looks good, we should apply the same sinkId approach to IcebergSink. It can cover more scenarios, such as batch mode where there is no checkpoint ID. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
