Fokko commented on code in PR #2173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2173#discussion_r2209391896


##########
pyiceberg/utils/schema_conversion.py:
##########
@@ -69,8 +69,10 @@
 LOGICAL_FIELD_TYPE_MAPPING: Dict[Tuple[str, str], PrimitiveType] = {
     ("date", "int"): DateType(),
     ("time-micros", "long"): TimeType(),
+    ("timestamp-millis", "int"): TimestampType(),

Review Comment:
   `TimestampType` is implied to be micros, since Iceberg initially only 
supported microsecond precision. With V3, we've added `TimestampNanoType`, but 
there is no notion of millisecond precision in the Iceberg specification.
   
   With this PR, we read the millis directly into micros (without doing a 
conversion from millis to micros). If we want to support this, I would expect 
some logic to convert millis to micros. This should probably take place with a 
[specialized 
reader](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/blob/ad8263b1be048c8cb67d40efe70f494a4f1cb374/pyiceberg/avro/reader.py#L170C7-L175).
 However, this would diverge PyIceberg from the other implementations, such as 
the reference [implementation in 
Java](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2215#discussion_r2208730847)
 as @kevinjqliu already pointed out.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to