tedyu commented on code in PR #12801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12801#discussion_r2049743332
##########
flink/v1.19/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/maintenance/operator/TriggerManager.java:
##########
@@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ public void initializeState(FunctionInitializationContext
context) throws Except
this.recoveryLock = lockFactory.createRecoveryLock();
if (context.isRestored()) {
shouldRestoreTasks = true;
+ } else {
Review Comment:
Looking at the code in JdbcLockFactory#unlock:
```
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
throw new UncheckedInterruptedException(e, "Interrupted during
unlock");
} catch (SQLException e) {
// SQL exception happened when getting/updating lock information
throw new UncheckedSQLException(e, "Failed to remove lock %s", this);
```
I wonder if `lock.unlock();` should be wrapped in try/finally block so that
`recoveryLock.unlock()` is always executed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
