Fokko commented on code in PR #317:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/317#discussion_r1984961840
##########
table/snapshots.go:
##########
@@ -197,3 +315,156 @@ type SnapshotLogEntry struct {
SnapshotID int64 `json:"snapshot-id"`
TimestampMs int64 `json:"timestamp-ms"`
}
+
+type SnapshotSummaryCollector struct {
+ metrics updateMetrics
+ partitionMetrics map[string]updateMetrics
+ maxChangedPartitionsForSummaries int
+}
+
+func (s *SnapshotSummaryCollector) setPartitionSummaryLimit(limit int) {
+ s.maxChangedPartitionsForSummaries = limit
+}
+
+func (s *SnapshotSummaryCollector) updatePartitionMetrics(spec
iceberg.PartitionSpec, df iceberg.DataFile, isAddFile bool, sc *iceberg.Schema)
error {
+ partitionPath := spec.PartitionToPath(getPartitionRecord(df,
spec.PartitionType(sc)), sc)
Review Comment:
It looks like we're passing down the spec and schema all the way here to
construct the partitionPath, I'm wondering if it would be cleaner to just pass
in the `partitionPath`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
