dramaticlly commented on code in PR #12135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12135#discussion_r1937711116


##########
spark/v3.5/spark-extensions/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/extensions/TestMetadataTables.java:
##########
@@ -62,6 +67,44 @@
 
 @ExtendWith(ParameterizedTestExtension.class)
 public class TestMetadataTables extends ExtensionsTestBase {
+  @Parameter(index = 3)
+  private int formatVersion;
+
+  @Parameters(name = "catalogName = {0}, implementation = {1}, config = {2}, 
formatVersion = {3}")
+  protected static Object[][] parameters() {

Review Comment:
   I think we can just add following lines to keep the original v2 coverage and 
then selectively enable v3 for catalogs which are ready. Since many iceberg 
users are still in the process of adopting REST based catalog and v2 is our 
default spec at the moment, I think keep the current coverage in place to test 
against metadata table change would be essential. 
   
   ```java
         {
           SparkCatalogConfig.HIVE.catalogName(),
           SparkCatalogConfig.HIVE.implementation(),
           SparkCatalogConfig.HIVE.properties(),
           2
         },
         {
           SparkCatalogConfig.HADOOP.catalogName(),
           SparkCatalogConfig.HADOOP.implementation(),
           SparkCatalogConfig.HADOOP.properties(),
           2
         },
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to