zhjwpku commented on PR #13: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/13#issuecomment-2545430346
> Thanks for the number @zhjwpku . > > > As the results shows, catch2 is better at preprocessed file size and compile time, but gtest is better when it comes to link time. I don't think the above tests is adequate to prove which is better than the other, since the UT in this PR is fairly simple. > > Well, it does tell us that they are close in terms of inclusion overhead, which was my concern. > > > I think we should focus closely on the specific benefits that the test framework is expected to deliver for this project. > > Agreed. Is there a detailed (hopefully unbiased) comparison somewhere? I found this link: https://yurigeronimus.medium.com/guide-for-choosing-a-test-framework-for-your-c-project-2a7741b53317 Not sure if it is biased though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
