RussellSpitzer commented on code in PR #11365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11365#discussion_r1881029096


##########
format/view-spec.md:
##########
@@ -97,7 +97,10 @@ Summary is a string to string map of metadata about a view 
version. Common metad
 
 View definitions can be represented in multiple ways. Representations are 
documented ways to express a view definition.
 
-A view version can have more than one representation. All representations for 
a version must express the same underlying definition. Engines are free to 
choose the representation to use.
+A view version can have more than one representation. All representations for 
a version must express the same underlying definition. Engines are free to 
choose the representation to use. For the table identifiers in the view 
definitions to be interoperable across engines, the following must be true:
+* All engines must resolve a fully specified SQL identifier to the same table 
in the same catalog.

Review Comment:
   If these are just recommendations should we just say "
   
   > Identifiers should always contain namespace information.
   > Catalog name should be omitted from any identifiers. Catalog names are 
engine independent so view representations should omit the catalog name when 
writing view representations. When reading engines should use the catalog name 
of the View Catalog as the catalog name when resolving identifiers.
   
   "



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to