wmoustafa commented on code in PR #11365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11365#discussion_r1862650411


##########
format/view-spec.md:
##########
@@ -97,7 +97,10 @@ Summary is a string to string map of metadata about a view 
version. Common metad
 
 View definitions can be represented in multiple ways. Representations are 
documented ways to express a view definition.
 
-A view version can have more than one representation. All representations for 
a version must express the same underlying definition. Engines are free to 
choose the representation to use.
+A view version can have more than one representation. All representations for 
a version must express the same underlying definition. Engines are free to 
choose the representation to use. For the table identifiers in the view 
definitions to be interoperable across engines, the following must be true:
+* All engines must resolve a fully specified SQL identifier to the same table 
in the same catalog.

Review Comment:
   > then engines should use the default-catalog or the view's catalog (which 
is allowed to be engine specific) and resolve to the same catalog and table.
   
   I think use `x or y` will weaken the contract. Typically default catalog is 
used when the catalog is omitted.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to