kevinjqliu commented on PR #11354:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11354#issuecomment-2438753142
> Yes I meant checking there is no top level "operation" field
{
snapshot {
operation: {} // <-- Did we do this before?
summary: {}
}
@RussellSpitzer I don't think having `operation` as a top-level field was
ever allowed.
According to Ryan on the devlist, `operation` and `summary` were introduced
at the same time.
According to [this
blame](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blame/7738e1d7228474e36f661cfa1a15a2e8f8410bcd/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/SnapshotParser.java#L63-L66),
`operation` is always written to the `summary` map
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
