amogh-jahagirdar commented on code in PR #11131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11131#discussion_r1815720545
##########
core/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/TestRowDelta.java:
##########
@@ -595,18 +601,18 @@ public void testDeleteDataFileWithDeleteFile() {
assertThat(deleteSnap.deleteManifests(table.io())).hasSize(1);
validateDeleteManifest(
deleteSnap.deleteManifests(table.io()).get(0),
- dataSeqs(1L),
- fileSeqs(1L),
- ids(deltaSnapshotId),
- files(FILE_A_DELETES),
- statuses(Status.ADDED));
+ dataSeqs(1L, 1L),
+ fileSeqs(1L, 1L),
+ ids(deltaSnapshotId, deltaSnapshotId),
+ files(FILE_A_DELETES, FILE_B_DELETES),
+ statuses(Status.ADDED, Status.ADDED));
Review Comment:
See https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11131#discussion_r1815710103 for
why I changed this test. TLDR, the behavior around rewriting manifests with
aged off deletes changed from "Always rewrite in case the manifest does have
aged off deletes" to "Remove the aged off deletes if the manifest actually
needs to be rewritten for other purposes". This test used to just work on the
assumption that this condition existed, but now we need to perform an action
(deleting FILE_B_DELETES) which forces the manifest to be rewritten along with
the deleted, aged off entries.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org
